Last week saw the 2012 Online Media Awards and the major winner of the night was The Guardian as they walked away with five top honours, including 'Website of the year' and 'Best technical innovation' for their iPad app... but how innovative is it?
[Image from Journalism.co.uk]
The 20 strong panel of judges stated that "iPad should be paying them." However, there is an argument that the runners up Financial Times, are looking to the future more with their web app as we move towards faster mobile internet.
As we move towards HTML5, people are even predicting this will be the end of native apps (the ones you download and sit on your phone), even if it takes a while.
In fact, The Boston Globe have been labeled as the "best website in the world" by the Society for News Design thanks to their responsive site. While responsive might not be right for everyone, The Boston Globe have a site that works brilliantly across all platforms.
On the official SND website, the designer Wilson Miner was quoted describing responsive web design as:
"one of those little shifts in thinking that cracks open a whole new set of questions and possibilities."
Which led SND to agree as they said that The Boston Globe:
"is aggressively rebalancing the signal-to-noise ratio of storytelling and even rethinking the shape and behavior of advertising."
[Image from CarlVLewis.net]
It appears that the Online Media Awards focused more on content and visual design, rather than technical innovations. However, with examples from The Boston Globe, is it about time that the UK publishing world stepped up and made great sites for everyone on every platform? If The Guardian moved towards a responsive site could they be contenders for 'Best website in the world'? Let us know what you think.